Skeletal muscle injury treatment using the Silk Elastin® injection in a rat model

Skeletal muscle injury (SMI) is often treated conservatively, although it can lead to scar tissue formation, which impedes muscle function and increases muscle re-injury risk. However, effective interventions for SMIs are yet to be established. Hypothesis: The administration of Silk Elastin® (SE), a novel artificial protein, to the SMI site can suppress scar formation and promote tissue repair. Study design: A controlled laboratory study.

Injection of SE gel to the SMI site may inhibit tissue scarring by reducing excessive fibroblast migration, thereby enhancing tissue repair. Clinical relevance: The findings of this study may contribute to the development of an early intervention method for SMIs.

In vitro: Fibroblast migration ability was assessed using a scratch assay. SE solution was added to the culture medium, and the fibroblast migration ability was compared across different concentrations. In vivo: An SMI model was established with Sprague-Dawley rats, which were assigned to three groups based on the material injected to the SMI site: SE gel (SE group; n = 8), atelocollagen gel (Atelo group; n = 8), and phosphate buffer saline (PBS group; n = 8). Histological evaluations were performed at weeks 1 and 4 following the SMI induction. In the 1-week model, we detected the expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 in the stroma using immunohistological evaluation and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. In the 4-week model, we measured tibialis anterior muscle strength upon peroneal nerve stimulation as a functional assessment.

In vitro: The fibroblast migration ability was suppressed by SE added at a concentration of 10&sup4; μg/mL in the culture medium. In vivo: In the 1-week model, the SE group exhibited significantly lower TGFβ -1 expression than the PBS group. In the 4-week model, the SE group had a significantly larger regenerated muscle fiber diameter and smaller scar formation area ratio than the other two groups. Moreover, the SE group was superior to the other two groups in terms of regenerative muscle strength.