Abstract
Climate change can increase the number of uprooted trees. Although there have been an increasing number of machine learning applications for satellite image analysis, the estimation of deracinated tree area by satellite image is not well developed. Therefore, we estimated the deracinated tree area of forests via machine-learning classification using Landsat 8 satellite images. We employed support vector machines (SVMs), random forests (RF), and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as potential machine learning methods, and tested their performance in estimating the deracinated tree area. We collected satellite images of upright trees, deracinated trees, soil, and others (e.g., waterbodies and cities), and trained them with the training data. We compared the accuracy represented by the correct classification rate of these methods, to determine the deracinated tree area. It was found that the SVM and RF performed better than the CNN for two-class classification (deracinated and upright trees), and the correct classification rates of all methods were up to 93%. We found that the CNN and RF performed significantly higher for the four- and two-class classification compared to the other methods, respectively. We conclude that the CNN is useful for estimating deracinated tree areas using Landsat 8 satellite images.