Exposure to selected pathogens in wild mammals from a rescue and rehabilitation center in southern Italy

意大利南部一家救助和康复中心的野生哺乳动物暴露于特定病原体的情况

阅读:1

Abstract

Wildlife is at the same time a reservoir and sentinel of numerous infections for humans and domestic animals. For this reason, wildlife rehabilitation centers represent an opportunity to carry out surveillance against the most varied infections. In this work, wild animals (canids, mustelids, erinaceids, and cervids) hospitalized at a first aid center in southern Italy were sampled and tested with multispecies ELISAs and rapid tests against a panel of pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and parasites. Foxes and wolves were exposed to Brucella canis, Coxiella burnetii, canine coronavirus, and Pseudorabies virus. Furthermore, one and two foxes tested positive for Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Dirofilaria immitis. Although not confirmed by molecular assay, hedgehogs and porcupines tested positive for Dirofilaria immitis antigens. No animals were exposed to Leishmania infantum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Mycobacterium avium, or Schmallenberg viruses. A fox and a roe deer had antibodies against the hepatitis E virus. The overall prevalence of Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen was 25 % (all the positive samples were collected from red foxes). Parasitological analyses showed the positivity of wild animals to Crenosoma spp., Strongyloides spp., Capillaria spp., and Cystoisospora spp. Wild canids also tested positive for Toxocara spp. and Trichuris vulpis. The results of this study have demonstrated not only the circulation of numerous pathogens in the wildlife of southern Italy but also underlined the risk to which the operators of first aid centers are subjected, considering that some of these animals stand periods of rehabilitation even of several months.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。