Abstract
Assessing wood moisture and density is essential to understanding ecological processes such as tree growth and wood formation. This study compared basic density and moisture content estimates for three Catalpa species (Catalpa ovata G. Don, Catalpa bungei C. A. Mey, and Catalpa fargesii Bureau) using three sampling methods (incremental cores, wood chips, and standard wood blocks). While strong correlations (r(2) ≥ 0.99) were observed among all methods, the incremental core approach exhibited significant species-specific biases-overestimating density by 27.31-12.31% on average while underestimating moisture content by 5.61-30.51%. Despite its cost-effectiveness and minimal sample collection requirements, the method's systematic deviations limit its applicability to multiple tree species. Consequently, we recommend developing species-specific linear calibration models that incorporate baseline data from standard wood block measurements to substantially improve estimation accuracy. This approach offers a practical, theory-supported solution for optimizing field sampling strategies in ecological research.