Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there are individual differences in the long-term efficacy of computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the same individuals undergoing computer-assisted and traditional total knee arthroplasty separately to determine whether computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty can provide better lower extremity radiographic results and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We searched literatures to identify relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of computer-assisted and traditional methods in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. After screening, quality evaluation and data extraction according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality and bias risks of the included studies were evaluated. The meta-analysis compared the radiographic results, functional outcomes and complications of the two techniques. RESULTS: Six clinical controlled trials were included, with total of 1098 patients. The meta-analysis showed that the accuracy in terms of the mechanical axis of the lower extremity, the sagittal alignment of the femoral component and the coronal alignment of the tibial component in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty was significantly better than those in traditional total knee arthroplasty. There were no differences in the functional results, revision rates or aseptic loosening rates between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: After excluding individual differences such as bone development and bone quality, although computer-assisted techniques can better accurately correct the mechanical axis of the lower extremity and the position of prosthesis implantation than traditional techniques, there is no significant difference in the functional results and revision rate of bilateral total knee arthroplasty in the same individual.