What Methods of Scoring Young Children's Spelling Best Predict Later Spelling Performance?

哪些方法能最好地预测幼儿拼写能力的提升,并预测其日后的拼写表现?

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children's spellings are often scored as correct or incorrect, but other measures may be better predictors of later spelling performance. METHOD: We examined seven measures of spelling in Reception Year and Year 1 (5-6 years old) as predictors of performance on a standardized spelling test in Year 2 (age 7). RESULTS: Correctness was the best predictor of later spelling by the middle of Year 1, and it significantly outperformed a binary measure of phonological plausibility at the end of Reception Year. Nonbinary measures based on Levenshtein distance were significant predictors of later spelling in the middle of Reception Year and in children who produced no correct spellings. Some widely used scales performed less well with children who did not yet produce any correct spellings. CONCLUSIONS: Nonbinary measures of spelling performance can predict later spelling performance, but for a more restricted period than anticipated based on many theories.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。