Comparative Analysis of Single-Channel and Multi-Channel Classification of Sleep Stages Across Four Different Data Sets

基于四个不同数据集的单通道和多通道睡眠分期分类比较分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: Manually labeling sleep stages is time-consuming and labor-intensive, making automatic sleep staging methods crucial for practical sleep monitoring. While both single- and multi-channel data are commonly used in automatic sleep staging, limited research has adequately investigated the differences in their effectiveness. Methods: In this study, four public data sets-Sleep-SC, APPLES, SHHS1, and MrOS1-are utilized, and an advanced hybrid attention neural network composed of a multi-branch convolutional neural network and the multi-head attention mechanism is employed for automatic sleep staging. Results: The experimental results show that, for sleep staging using 2-5 classes, a combination of single-channel electroencephalography (EEG) and dual-channel electrooculography (EOG) consistently outperforms single-channel EEG with single-channel EOG, which in turn outperforms single-channel EEG or single-channel EOG alone. For instance, for five-class sleep staging using the MrOS1 data set, the combination of single-channel EEG and dual-channel EOG resulted in an accuracy of 87.18%, whereas the combination of single-channel EEG and single-channel EOG yielded an accuracy of 85.77%. In comparison, single-channel EEG alone achieved an accuracy of 85.25% and single-channel EOG alone achieved an accuracy of 83.66%. Conclusions: This study highlights the significance of combining EEG and EOG signals in automatic sleep staging, while also providing valuable insights for the channel design of portable sleep monitoring devices.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。