Abstract
The speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) often makes psychophysical data difficult to interpret. Accordingly, the SAT experimental procedure and model were proposed for an integrated account of the speed and accuracy of responses. However, the extensive data collection for a SAT experiment has blocked its popularity. For a quick estimation of SAT function (SATf), we previously developed a Bayesian adaptive SAT method, including an online stimulus selection strategy. By simulations, the method was proved efficient with high accuracy and precision with minimal trials, adequate for practically applying a single condition task. However, it calls for extensions to more general designs with multiple conditions and should be revised to achieve improved estimation performance. It also demands real experimental validation with human participants. In the current study, we suggested an improved method to measure SATfs for multiple task conditions concurrently and to enhance robustness in general designs. The performance was evaluated with simulation studies and a psychophysical experiment using a flanker task. Simulation results revealed that the proposed method with the adaptive stimulus selection strategy efficiently estimated multiple SATfs and improved performance even for cases with an extreme parameter value. In the psychophysical experiment, SATfs estimated by minimal adaptive trials (1/8 of conventional trials) showed high agreement with those by conventional trials required for reliably estimating multiple SATfs. These results indicate that the Bayesian adaptive SAT method is reliable and efficient in estimating SATfs in most experimental settings and may apply to SATf estimation in general behavioral research designs.