Abstract
Background/Objectives: Primary cleft lip repair is a procedure to restore lip function and harmonious nasolabial appearance. However, the actual effects on nasolabial appearance have been insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was therefore to critically review surgical results using well-validated objective and subjective methods and standardised outcome measures. Methods: A total of 26 non-syndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip +/- cleft palate were assessed retrospectively. Uniform 2D photographs of the nasolabial region were objectively analysed using SymNose software. The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale was employed for the subjective evaluation by a total of 255 observers with different backgrounds and experience levels in cleft surgery. Results: Significant positive correlation was identified between objective measurement of upper lip asymmetry and subjective assessment (p = 0.02). Furthermore, a significant difference emerged in the assessment of the nasolabial region depending on the rater's professional background (p < 0.001). A major discrepancy was observed between the rating of maxillofacial consultants and those of laypersons and patients affected by cleft lip +/- cleft palate. Conclusions: The evaluation of attractiveness depends significantly on the professional background of the observer. The more interaction people have with individuals after cleft lip repair, the less they consider the aesthetics conspicuous. Achieving the highest possible postoperative nasolabial symmetry should be a main objective in primary cleft lip repair.