Neuroprotective effects of caffeine, erythropoietin, magnesium sulfate, and thyroxine in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis

咖啡因、促红细胞生成素、硫酸镁和甲状腺素对早产儿的神经保护作用:一项网络荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Premature infants are prone to having adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes such as cerebral palsy. Some neuroprotective drugs can improve adverse neurological outcomes in premature infants. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of four common neuroprotective drugs on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. METHODS: To identify eligible randomized clinical trials, three databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE) were searched from the inception date through March 2024. Neuroprotective drugs included erythropoietin, magnesium sulfate, caffeine, and thyroxine. The primary outcome was whether neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) or death occurred. Studies that met the eligibility criteria were assessed, and data were extracted. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was computed to evaluate and rank the neuroprotective efficacy of various drugs. RESULTS: Caffeine [relative risk (RR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.86] showed the most promising effect in reducing the risk of premature infants with NDI. Caffeine (RR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43-0.70) and magnesium sulfate (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54-0.80) showed promising effects in reducing the risk of premature infants with cerebral palsy. According to the SUCRA value, caffeine (NDI: 87.9%, cerebral palsy: 91.2%) may be the best drug for neurodevelopmental protection in preterm infants. CONCLUSIONS: The neuroprotective effects of caffeine were observed in the reduction of NDI and cerebral palsy, whereas magnesium sulfate, given to pregnant women at risk of preterm birth, had a protective effect in reducing the risk of cerebral palsy. The analysis of the SUCRA value indicated that caffeine may offer greater benefits compared to other medications in the neuroprotection of premature infants. The findings of this network meta-analysis ought to be regarded as theoretical rather than validated. Additional trials are necessary to validate the existing findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。