Conclusion
1) Signatures of GH and insulin signaling differ as a function of acromegaly treatment modality. 2) Extra-pituitary effects of SA may account for this. 3) The clinical implications remain to be investigated.
Objective
To compare GH and insulin signaling after iv GH exposure in acromegalic patients controlled by surgery (n = 9) or SA (n = 9). Design: Each patient was studied for 3 hours after an overnight fast (t = -60 to 120 minutes). GH was administered at t = 0 minutes; muscle and fat biopsies were obtained at t = 0 minutes and at t = 30 minutes (muscle) and t = 120 minutes (fat). Interstitial fluid was obtained from skin suction blisters (t = 0 minutes). Main outcome measures: GH and insulin signalling in muscle and fat. GH and IGF-1 in serum and interstitial fluid; insulin and free fatty acids in serum.
Results
The groups were comparable as regards GH and IGF-1. The SA group exhibited higher free fatty acid and glucose levels; basal suppressor of cytokine signaling protein 1 (SOCS1) mRNA in fat was increased in the SA group and correlated positively with SA dose (r2 = 0.54; P = .04). GH-induced GH signalling (pSTAT5b) in muscle occurred in both groups together with increased expression of SOCS and CISH genes. GH-induced pAKTthr308 was observed in SA patients. In both groups, mRNA expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, a suppressor of insulin signaling, increased in fat after GH.