Pancreatic SBRT on four modern platforms: dosimetric and radiobiological gains with the Ethos ring-gantry linac versus TrueBeam, Halcyon, and helical tomotherapy

胰腺立体定向放射治疗在四种现代平台上的应用:Ethos环形机架直线加速器与TrueBeam、Halcyon和螺旋断层放射治疗相比,在剂量学和放射生物学方面的优势

阅读:3

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform the first comprehensive dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of four modern delivery platforms for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer: a conventional C-arm linac (TrueBeam), two established ring-gantry systems (Halcyon and helical tomotherapy [HT]), and the novel online-adaptive ring-gantry platform (Ethos). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with pancreatic cancer were retrospectively planned to 35 Gy in 5 fractions using identical contours and dose constraints on all four platforms. Three-arc VMAT plans were generated for TrueBeam, Halcyon, and Ethos (Acuros XB dose calculation for Ethos; AAA for TrueBeam/Halcyon). For HT plans, a dynamic field width of 2.5 cm was used, and the collapsed cone convolution algorithm was utilized. Target coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient metrics (R(50), D(2cm)), organs-at-risk (OARs) doses, and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) with tissue-specific parameters were compared using statistical tests. RESULTS: All plans met clinical constraints. Coplanar platforms (TrueBeam, Halcyon, Ethos) achieved significantly better CI vs. HT (0.90 ± 0.02 vs. 0.84 ± 0.10) and lower R(50) (3.48–3.53 vs. 4.71 ± 0.58) and, and steeper dose fall-off compared with HT. Ethos yielded the lowest mean doses to bilateral kidneys (2.80 ± 0.57 Gy vs. 3.98–4.93 Gy on other platforms) and the most favourable high-dose sparing for bowel, stomach, and duodenum. EUD analysis confirmed Ethos achieved the lowest values in seven of eight OARs, with the largest gains in kidneys (6.4 ± 1.4 Gy vs. 9.1–11.8 Gy) and bowel. CONCLUSION: Among contemporary platforms, Ethos provided a more favorable planning performance under these standardized conditions. These findings are limited to standard-dose (35 Gy/5F) SBRT planning and do not imply clinical superiority at escalated dose levels. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-026-02812-1.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。