The effects of stroboscopic visual training on coordination, change-of-direction, and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players

频闪视觉训练对大学生篮球运动员协调性、变向能力和决策能力的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of stroboscopic visual training (SVT) combined with basketball-specific training (ST) on coordination, change-of-direction (COD), and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players. METHODS: 42 male collegiate basketball players (aged 18-25) were classified as Tier 2 (National Level) and randomly assigned to one of three groups: SVT combined with basketball-specific training (SVT + ST, n = 14), basketball-specific training (ST, n = 14), and regular training (RT, n = 14). Intervention effects were evaluated using the Harre Circuit Coordination Test, the 505 Change-of-Direction Speed Test, and a 3D Tactical Animation Decision-Making System. The SVT + ST group performed ST while wearing stroboscopic glasses with progressively increasing difficulty. The ST group underwent identical drills without visual disruption, and the RT group continued with routine basketball training. The intervention lasted 8 weeks, with three 40 min sessions per week. RESULTS: Significant TIME × GROUP effects were observed. In the coordination test, completion time (p = 0.011, ηp(2) = 0.207) and errors (p ≤ 0.01, ηp(2) = 0.488) improved, with SVT ± ST demonstrating greater gains than ST and RT (completion time: p = 0.013, d = 0.763, large; errors vs. RT: p ≤ 0.01, d = 4.009). In the 505 COD test, significant effects were identified for completion time (p ≤ 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.69) and asymmetry (p ≤ 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.43), favoring SVT ± ST (completion time vs. ST and RT: p ≤ 0.001, d = 3.943, large; asymmetry vs. RT: p ≤ 0.001, d = 2.074, large). For decision-making, TIME × GROUP effects were also observed for decision time (DT), motor-execution time (MET), decision accuracy (DA), and the cognitive-motor efficiency index (CMEI) (DT: p ≤ 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.43; MET: p ≤ 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.49; DA: p ≤ 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.48; CMEI: p ≤ 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.79), with SVT ± ST outperforming ST and RT (DT: d = 1.909, large; MET vs. RT: d = 2.102, large; DA: d = 2.341, large; CMEI: d = 3.221, large; all p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Integrating SVT with basketball-specific training significantly improved coordination, COD, and decision-making performance in collegiate male basketball players.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。