Accuracy and reliability of non-invasive pressure-strain loop for myocardial work assessment in functional single ventricle patients

无创压力-应变环法评估功能性单心室患者心肌做功的准确性和可靠性

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In biventricular circulation, myocardial work indices derived from pressure-strain loops (PSL) show potential for effectively evaluating ventricular function in both left and right ventricles. However, these novel myocardial work parameters have not been extensively investigated in patients with functional single ventricle (FSV). OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between myocardial work indices and parameters from cardiac catheterization in FSV patients, and to compare differences between functional single ventricle subtypes. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 38 FSV patients, including 17 with single left ventricle (SLV) patients and 21 with single right ventricle (SRV) patients. All patients underwent echocardiography and cardiac catheterization on the same day. To analyze correlations, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was applied, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were developed to evaluate predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Compared to SLV patients, SRV patients exhibited significantly higher global wasted work (GWW) (194.0 [132.5, 309.5] vs. 101.0 [66.5, 143.5] mmHg%, p = 0.012) accompanied by significantly reduced global work efficiency (GWE) (86.0% [81.5, 90.0] vs. 93.0% [89.5, 95.0], p = 0.004). In all FSV patients, global work index (GWI) (r=-0.540, p < 0.01), global constructive work (GCW) (r=-0.436, p < 0.01), and GWE (r=-0.831, p < 0.001) showed significant negative correlations with ventricular end-diastolic pressure (VEDP), while GWW demonstrated a significant positive correlation with VEDP (r = 0.738, p < 0.001). PSL parameters exhibited good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and high predictive value for VEDP > 10 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-strain loop indices can effectively evaluate cardiac function in FSV patients and reveal functional differences between subtypes. Larger studies are needed to validate the value of these emerging indicators.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。