Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) technology provide a novel solution for monitoring dynamic glucose fluctuations during endurance exercise, enabling personalized carbohydrate refueling strategies. However, direct evidence demonstrating its superiority over traditional refueling guidelines has been lacking. This exploratory study compared a CGM-informed protocol with a traditional interval-based (TRAD) carbohydrate refueling protocol on endurance exercise responses. METHODS: Twelve healthy, non-diabetic males (age = 32.3 ± 6.3 years) participated in two trials involving 75 minutes of continuous cycling at 50% peak power output, with the two carbohydrate refueling protocols implemented in a randomized, crossover order. In the TRAD protocol, participants received standard carbohydrate solutions at regular 15-min intervals, while replenishment timing in the CGM-informed protocol was guided by real-time glucose trends, particularly during declines. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in heart rate, blood lactate, or perceived exertion between conditions (all p > 0.05). However, CGM-informed protocol displayed a lower coefficient of variation of glucose levels (8.82 ± 4.68%) than the TRAD protocol (11.95 ± 3.41%, Cohen's d = 0.76, p = 0.013), indicating a steadier blood glucose trend. The mean 75-minute interstitial glucose total area under the curve was significantly lower for the CGM-informed protocol (423.4 ± 39.1 mmol·min·L-1), compared to the TRAD protocol (448.6 ± 38.2 mmol·min·L-1, Cohen's d = 0.65, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: While the CGM-informed protocol did not demonstrate beneficial effects on physiological responses over the TRAD protocol, it may aid in stabilizing glucose levels during prolonged endurance exercise. Further research is warranted to explore the applications of personalized carbohydrate refueling strategy based on CGM technology on athletic performance across various exercise protocols. .