Functional residual capacity and elastic power as prognostic markers in acute respiratory distress syndrome

功能残气量和弹性功率作为急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预后标志物

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if functional residual capacity (FRC) and elastic power (EP) could predict outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: This retrospective study included 353 ARDS patients admitted to our hospital between 2018 and 2025. Patients were categorized into good (n=251) and poor (n=102) prognosis groups based on their 28-day outcomes. FRC was measured using nitrogen washout, and EP was calculated using the formula: 0.098 × VT × RR × ½(PEEP + Pplat). After comparing these parameters between groups, multivariate regression and ROC analyses were performed to identify predictors. We validated our findings in an external cohort of 101 patients. RESULTS: Poor outcome patients had significantly lower FRC and higher EP (both P<0.001). A positive correlation between EP and mortality was observed (rho=0.298, P<0.001), while FRC showed a significant inverse relationship (rho=-0.177, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that EP (OR=1.251, P<0.001), FRC (OR=0.956, P=0.039), ARDS severity (OR=8.421, P<0.001), and PEEP (OR=1.338, P=0.011) were independent predictors of outcomes. A predictive model combining FRC and EP showed strong performance, with an AUC of 0.809 in internal validation and 0.819 in the external cohort. EP alone exhibited a high specificity of 0.944 at a cutoff value of 21.535 J/min. CONCLUSIONS: ARDS patients with low FRC and high EP face an increased risk of mortality. Combining these measures enhances prognostic accuracy and can help tailor ventilation strategies for improved outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。