Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for esophageal cancer requires large planning target volume (PTV) margins to account for interfraction variations, increasing radiation-associated side-effects. Cone-beam computed tomography-based (CBCT) online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) enables daily contour and plan adaptation, addressing anatomical changes and allowing for reduced PTV margins while ensuring target coverage. This study compared the dose-volume parameters of daily oART to non-adaptive IGRT in patients with esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (41.4 Gy/23 fractions) were included retrospectively. Daily IGRT CBCTs were used to emulate oART with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted target and organs-of-interest contouring, manual edits when necessary, and adaptive re-optimization. PTV margins (Anterior-Posterior, Left-Right, Caudal-Cranial) were reduced from 5, 7, 10 mm (IGRT) to 3, 5, 5 mm (oART), respectively. Mean organs-of-interest and fraction-equivalent (FE) dose-volume metrics between delivered and adaptive plans were compared. RESULTS: Compared with IGRT, oART plans significantly reduced the number of fractions with internal clinical target volume underdosing (V(95%) < 98%: n = 32 vs. n = 1 fraction; p = 0.002) and median hotspot dose ( D0.1cm3 : 106.2% vs. 103.9%; p = 0.002). Mean heart dose decreased by 10% (p = 0.037), and heart FE-V(30Gy) by 42% (7.3% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.002). Mean lung dose was reduced by 11% (p = 0.002), lung FE-V(20Gy) by 39% (4.2% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.002), and lung FE-V(10Gy) by 22% (24.6% vs. 19.3%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: CBCT-based oART improved dose distribution in esophageal cancer by enabling PTV margin reduction, improved target coverage and superior organs-of-interest sparing. These findings encourage clinical implementation to reduce radiation-associated side-effects.