Abstract
While computational epitope prediction methods have found broad application, their use, specifically in allergy-related contexts, remains relatively less explored. This study benchmarks several publicly available epitope prediction tools, focusing on the allergenic IgE and T-cell epitopes of Fel d 1, an extensively studied allergen. Using a variety of tools accessible via the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) and other resources, we evaluate their ability to identify the known linear IgE and T-cell epitopes of Fel d 1. Our results show a limited effectiveness for B-cell epitope prediction methods, with most performing only marginally better than random selection. We also explored the general predictive abilities on other allergens, and the results were largely random. When predicting T-cell epitopes, ProPred successfully identified all known Fel d 1 T-cell epitopes, whereas the IEDB approach missed two known epitopes and demonstrated a tendency to over-predict. However, when applied to a larger test set, both methods performed only slightly better than random selection. Our findings show the limitations of current computational epitope prediction methods in accurately identifying allergenic epitopes, emphasizing the need for methodological advancements in allergen research.