Right-side versus left-side hemihepatectomy for the treatment of Bismuth type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study

右侧半肝切除术与左侧半肝切除术治疗Bismuth IV型肝门部胆管癌的比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Radical surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) patients. However, data on left-sided hemihepatectomy (LH) and right-sided hemihepatectomy (RH) outcomes for Bismuth-Corlette type IV PHC are scarce and controversial. This study aimed to explore surgical and long-term outcomes of LH and RH in these patients. METHODS: Medical records of Bismuth type IV PHC patients who had liver resection from 2009 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical results and long-term survival were the primary outcomes, compared via one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: 218 Bismuth type IV PHC patients (146 LH, 72 RH) were analyzed. The RH group had a higher proportion of preoperative biliary drainage (p = 0.02) and more frequent portal vein embolization (p < 0.0001). R0 resection rate was 90.37% (197/218) with no significant LH-RH difference. Post-operative severe complication (grades 3-5) and 90-day mortality rates were comparable. Overall survival was similar (overall cohort: p=0.21; matched cohort: p=0.54). But in the overall cohort, R0-resected RH patients had marginally better survival (p = 0.064). Prognostic factors included carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), age, tumor vascular invasion, and severe post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative morbidity and mortality rate was comparable between LH and RH for Bismuth type IV PHC. Although RH showed a favorable survival from the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, no significant difference was observed in overall survival after LH versus RH for the overall cohort and the matched cohort after PSM.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。