Correlation Between Dual-Time-Point FDG PET and Tumor Microenvironment Immune Types in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

High glucose metabolism on DTP 18F-FDG PET correlated with the TMIT-I tumors, and the Meta-Sig and combined model based on clinical and metabolic information could improve the performance of identifying the patients who may respond to immunotherapy.

A retrospective analysis was performed in 91 patients with NSCLC who underwent preoperative DTP 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. MPs in the early scan (eSUVmax, eSUVmean, eMTV, eTLG) and delayed scan (dSUVmax, dSUVmean, dMTV, dTLG) were calculated, respectively. The change in MPs (ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVmean, ΔMTV, ΔTLG) between the two time points were calculated. Tumor specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for PD-1/PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). TIME was classified into four immune types (TMIT I ~ IV) according to the expression of PD-L1 and CD8+ TILs. Correlations between MPs with TMITs and the immune-related biomarkers were analyzed. A composite metabolic signature (Meta-Sig) and a combined model of Meta-Sig and clinical factors were constructed to predict patients with TMIT I tumors.

Dual-time-point 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (DTP 18F-FDG PET), which reflects the dynamics of tumor glucose metabolism, may also provide a novel approach to the characterization of both cancer cells and immune cells within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). We investigated the correlations between the metabolic parameters (MPs) of DTP 18F-FDG PET images and the tumor microenvironment immune types (TMITs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

eSUVmax, eSUVmean, dSUVmax, dSUVmean, ΔSUVmax, ΔSUVmean, and ΔTLG were significantly higher in PD-L1 positive patients (p = 0.0007, 0.0006, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, 0.0002, 0.0002, 0.0247, respectively), and in TMIT-I tumors (p = 0.0001, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, 0.0009, 0.0009, 0.0144, respectively). Compared to stand-alone MP, the Meta-Sig and combined model displayed better performance for assessing TMIT-I tumors (Meta-sig: AUC = 0.818, sensitivity = 86.36%, specificity = 73.91%; Model: AUC = 0.869, sensitivity = 77.27%, specificity = 82.61%).