Conclusion
Prophylactic administration of NBD peptides to bone-defect areas inhibited bacterial spread and promoted bone regeneration, making NBD peptides a possible treatment option for prophylaxis in bone infections.
Methods
An S. aureus osteomyelitis rabbit model was used in this study. The rabbits were divided into four groups: NBD, cefazolin, control, and PBS. Clinical and laboratory indicators of erythrocyte-sedimentation rate, CRP, and TNFα levels were assessed to monitor systemic reactions. The efficacy of NBD peptides in S. aureus-induced osteomyelitis was evaluated by radiological, histological, and microbiological examinations, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and micro-CT scans.
Results
In general, NBD peptides effectively reduced clinical signs in rabbits when compared with the control group. Radiography indicated that there was more severe osteomyelitis in the bacterium-infection control group. There was no significance between cefazolin- and NBD-group average scores. The histological results of the lesion slices further confirmed different severity among the groups. Additionally, significant pathological differences were found between the cefazolin and NBD groups, and the PBS group showed no obvious pathological changes.
