Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS)

中文版髋关节功能障碍和骨关节炎结局评分-身体功能简表(HOOS-PS)的适应性和心理测量学评价

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic hip joint disease has a high prevalence in China, and the primary scale currently used to assess functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS). Therefore, our objective was to translate the HOOS-PS scale into Simplified Chinese and evaluate its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in THA patients. METHODS: First, we followed the widely accepted cross-cultural translation process to translate the original HOOS-PS into the Chinese version of HOOS-PS (CHOOS-PS). Then, we recruited patients with chronic hip joint disease who were scheduled to undergo THA to complete the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and CHOOS-PS scales. Subsequently, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM), effect size (ES), Spearman correlation coefficient (r(s)), standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on the scale scores. RESULT: Ultimately, 142, 138, and 109 patients completed the scale assessments at three stages. The results showed that CHOOS-PS has excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.848–0.919) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.892). The CHOOS-PS questionnaire demonstrated excellent correlation with the OHS scale (r(s) = 0.874), good correlation with all three subscales of the WOMAC (r(s) = 0.638–0.764), moderate to good correlation with the physical dimensions of the SF-36 (r(s) = 0.424–0.693), and poor to fair correlation with the mental dimensions of the SF-36 (r(s) = 0.165–0.319). The CFA results showed a good fit (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.050, the comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.995, and the Tucher-Lewis Index (TLI) value = 0.991). These results indicate that the HOOS-PS scale has good construct validity. Additionally, CHOOS-PS showed good responsiveness (ES = 1.93, SRM = 1.88). CONCLUSION: The CHOOS-PS scale is a reliable tool for evaluating the functional outcomes of Chinese patients with chronic hip joint disease after THA.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。