Comparison of methods for inframammary fold fixation of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction

比较用于乳房下皱襞固定的深部下腹壁穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的方法

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various methods for inframammary fold (IMF) fixation in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction have been reported. This quantitative study focused on the comparison of IMF fixation results between immediate one-stage (internal fixation), delayed one-stage (de-epithelialized method), and two-stage (capsule fixation) reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective study of 34 patients who underwent unilateral DIEP flap reconstruction was conducted. The IMF height, grouped by reconstruction methods, was measured from the standardized clinical photographs >6 months after the DIEP flap reconstruction (post-DIEP) and >6 months after the flap revision surgery (final), and compared with the healthy side. RESULTS: In the order of immediate one-stage, delayed one-stage, and two-stage reconstruction, respectively, the average (± standard deviation) post-DIEP IMF heights were -1.60 ± 0.65 cm, -0.19 ± 1.16 cm, and -1.40 ± 1.11 cm, and the average final IMF heights were -1.20 ± 0.44 cm, -0.19 ± 0.52 cm, and -0.68 ± 0.98 cm. CONCLUSION: After DIEP flap breast reconstruction, the IMF of the reconstructed side tends to be lower than the healthy side. The de-epithelialized method used in delayed one-stage reconstruction showed relatively good IMF fixation after DIEP flap reconstruction compared with other reconstruction methods. By performing additional IMF procedures during flap revision surgery, the average IMF height ranged from -1.2 to -0.19 cm compared with the healthy side.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。