Comprehensive evaluation of the toxicological effects of commonly encountered synthetic cathinones using in silico methods

利用计算机模拟方法对常见合成卡西酮的毒理学效应进行全面评价

阅读:2

Abstract

Synthetic cathinones (SCs), a group of new psychoactive substances (NPS), are designer molecules with hallucinogenic and psychostimulatory effects. Although the structural similarities of SCs to amphetamines suggest that they may have similar toxicity profiles to those of amphetamine congeners, little is known about SCs from a toxicological point of view. In the present study, the toxicity profiles of commonly encountered SCs (n = 65), listed in the 2020 Report of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), were evaluated using in silico methods. We aimed to gain a deeper understanding of key toxicological endpoints: acute oral toxicity (LD(50)), mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity prediction using EPA TEST (v.5.1.2 and 4.2.1), VEGA (v.1.2.3), and ProTox (v.3.0). Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic (ADME) properties were estimated using SwissADME and pkCSM. 2,3-MDMC (41) was predicted to be the most lethal SC by the VEGA KNN and the EPA TEST v.5.1.2 with an oral rat LD(50) value of 105.17 and 117.77 mg/kg, respectively. 4-BEC (2) was the only molecule with a consensus score of positive prediction greater than 0.90 in both TEST mutagenicity models. 2,3-MDMC (41) and methylone (52) were predicted as carcinogenic by VEGA carcinogenicity CAESAR, ISS, IRFMN-ISSCAN-CGX, oral classification, and ProTox models. These two SCs were predicted to be active by VEGA chromosomal aberration (CORAL) and in vitro micronuclei-inducing activity (IRFMN-VERMEER) models. Our results concluded that given the prolonged exposure duration and age range, the genotoxic and carcinogenic potential of SCs should be considered, among other known toxic effects.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。