Comparative Outcomes of Letrozole Versus Clomiphene Citrate for Ovulation Induction in Patients With PCOS: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬治疗多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to synthesize available high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing reproductive outcomes between letrozole (LE) and clomiphene citrate (CC) for ovulation induction in women with PCOS. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251013416). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, the National Library of Medicine, and Google Scholar up to March 2025. A total of 32 RCTs were included. Statistical analysis used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), as determined using Review Manager. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. The risk of bias was evaluated using the ROB 2 tool. The primary outcome was ovulation rate; secondary outcomes included pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy rates. RESULTS: LE showed higher ovulation (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.11-1.25; I2: 57%) and pregnancy rates (RR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.39-1.76; I2: 21%) compared to CC. LE also had a higher live birth rate (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.24-1.91; I2: 35%). Miscarriage rates were similar between groups (RR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.73-1.28; I2: 0%). The multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the LE group (RR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.98; I2: 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole shows greater effectiveness than clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in women with PCOS, with a lower risk of multiple pregnancy and similar miscarriage risk. These findings support its use as a first-line treatment in clinical practice.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。