Abstract
BACKGROUND: The EORTC questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 are commonly used to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients with meningiomas but have not undergone a disease-specific validation. The study aimed to address this issue and to determine the interrater reliability of WHO performance status (PS) assessments in these patients. METHODS: This population-based study included prospectively enrolled intracranial meningiomas treated at Umeå University Hospital between October 14, 2010, and December 31, 2021, followed up until March 30, 2023. Patients were assessed by the EORTC questionnaires before and at 3 months after surgery. WHO PS categorized as high (0-1) or low (2-5) were evaluated for interrater reliability and used together with sick-leave status to determine the questionnaires' clinical validity. Remaining psychometric properties of the questionnaires were analyzed by conventional methods. RESULTS: Of 513 eligible surgeries, 454 (88.5%) had responded to at least 1 questionnaire. WHO PS interrater agreement was 94.4%. The EORTC questionnaires' ability to distinguish between clinically distinct groups was high. Items correlated better with their own scale than others (most r > 0.70). Items measuring various aspects of the same construct showed good internal consistency (nearly all α > 0.70). Questionnaire responsiveness to symptom changes over time was acceptable. Several scales displayed floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 are overall valid instruments to evaluate patients with intracranial meningiomas but require awareness of certain limitations when specific functions and symptoms are addressed. WHO PS assessments can be applied to meningioma patients with high reproducibility between observers.