Lack of harmonisation of greenhouse gases reporting standards and the methane emissions gap

温室气体报告标准缺乏协调以及甲烷排放差距

阅读:3

Abstract

Monitoring companies' contributions to climate dynamics and their exposure to transition risks requires accurate measurements of their non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gas emissions (non-CO(2) GHG). However, carbon accounting standards are not harmonised and allow for some discretion when converting emissions of different GHGs into CO(2) equivalent units, the currency in which carbon footprints are expressed. Focusing on methane, we build counterfactual harmonised standards using the latest IPCC Global Warming Potential (GWP) values over 100 years and estimate a cumulative gap in reported methane emissions of 170MtCO(2)e ( ~6Tg) over a sample of 2864 companies. Changing the counterfactual from GWP(100)to GWP(20), as recently codified in certain jurisdictions and initiatives, increases the cumulative gap to 3300MtCO(2)e ( ~40Tg). The gap only covers direct emissions and hence understates the extent of potential under-reporting across value chains. Overall, our study underscores the importance of global harmonisation of CO(2)-equivalence standards to coherently track corporate GHG emissions and their exposure to transition risks.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。