Abstract
Passivation treatment is an effective method to suppress various defects in perovskite solar cells (PSCs), such as cation vacancies, under-coordinated Pb(2+) or I(-), and Pb-I antisite defects. A thorough understanding of the diversified impacts of different defect passivation methods (DPMs) on the device performance will be beneficial for making wise DPM choices. Herein, we choose a hydrophobic Lewis acid tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (BCF), which can dissolve in both the perovskite precursor and anti-solvent, as the passivation additive. BCF treatment can immobilize organic cations via forming hydrogen bonds. Three kinds of DPMs based on BCF are applied to modify perovskite films in this work. It is found that the best DPM with BCF dissolved in anti-solvent can not only passivate multiple defects in perovskite, but also inhibit δ phase perovskite and improve the stability of devices. Meanwhile, DPM with BCF dissolved in both the perovskite precursor and anti-solvent can cause cracks and voids in perovskite films and deteriorate device performance, which should be avoided in practical applications. As a result, PSCs based on optimal DPMs of BCF present an increased efficiency of 22.86% with negligible hysteresis as well as improved overall stability. This work indicates that the selection and optimization of DPMs have an equally important influence on the photovoltaic performance of PSCs as the selection of passivation additives.