Abstract
Serial passaging is a fundamental technique in experimental evolution. The choice of bottleneck severity and frequency poses a dilemma: longer growth periods allow beneficial mutants to arise and grow over more generations, but simultaneously necessitate more severe bottlenecks with a higher risk of those same mutations being lost. Short growth periods require less severe bottlenecks, but come at the cost of less time between transfers for beneficial mutations to establish. The standard laboratory protocol of 24-h growth cycles with severe bottlenecking has logistical advantages for the experimenter but limited theoretical justification. Here we demonstrate that contrary to standard practice, the rate of adaptive evolution is maximized when bottlenecks are frequent and small, indeed infinitesimally so in the limit of continuous culture. This result derives from revising key assumptions underpinning previous theoretical work, notably changing the metric of optimization from adaptation per serial transfer to per experiment runtime. We also show that adding resource constraints and clonal interference to the model leaves the qualitative results unchanged. Implementing these findings will require liquid-handling robots to perform frequent bottlenecks, or chemostats for continuous culture. Further innovation in and adoption of these technologies has the potential to accelerate the rate of discovery in experimental evolution.