Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite reporting poorer self-rated mental health (SRMH) than boys, girls exhibit greater resilience and academic achievement, and less risk taking or death by suicide. Might this apparent paradox be an artefact arising from girls' and boys' different interpretations of the meaning of SRMH? We examined whether the indicator, SRMH, had a different meaning for girls and boys. METHODS: In 2021-2, we circulated social media invitations for youth age 13-18 to complete an online survey about their mental health, and which of 26 individual and social circumstances shaped that rating. All data were submitted anonymously with no link to IP addresses. After comparing weightings for each characteristic, factor analyses identified domains for the whole group and for girls and boys. RESULTS: Poor SRMH was reported by 47% of 506 girls and 27.8% of 216 boys. In general, circumstances considered important to this rating were similar for all, although boys focussed more on sense of identity, self-confidence, physical well-being, exercise, foods eaten and screen time, while girls paid more attention to having a boyfriend or girlfriend, comparisons with peers, and school performance. With factor analysis and common to boys and girls, domains of resilience, behavior/community, family, relationships with peers and future vision emerged. Girls' poorer SRMH did not arise from a more expansive interpretation of mental health. Instead, it may reflect perceived or real disadvantages in individual or social circumstances. Alternatively, girls' known greater resilience may propel lower SRMH which they use intuitively to motivate future achievement and avoid the complacency of thinking that 'all is well'. CONCLUSIONS: The relative similarity of attributes considered before rating one's mental health suggests validity of this subjective measure among girls and boys.