Abstract
PURPOSE: Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel imaging technique used to noninvasively evaluate pulmonary perfusion. However, the standard DCR protocol, which is roughly adapted to the patient's body size, occasionally causes over- or underexposure, which could influence clinical evaluation. Therefore, we proposed a refined protocol by increasing the number of patient body mass index (BMI) categories from three to seven groups and verified its usefulness by comparing the image sensitivity indicators (S-values) and entrance surface doses (ESDs) of the conventional protocol with those of our refined protocol. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 388 datasets (standing position, 224; supine position, 164) for the conventional protocol (December 2019-April 2021) and 336 datasets (standing position, 233; supine position, 103) for the refined protocol (June-November 2021). The conventional protocol (BMI-3 protocol) divided the patients into three BMI groups (BMI < 17, 17≤BMI < 25, and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) ), whereas the refined protocol (BMI-7 protocol) divided the patients into seven BMI groups (BMI < 17, 17 ≤ BMI < 20, 20 ≤ BMI < 23, 23 ≤ BMI < 26, 26 ≤ BMI < 29, 29 ≤ BMI < 32, and BMI ≥ 32 kg/m(2) ). The coefficients of variation (CVs) for the S-values and ESDs acquired using the two protocols were compared. RESULTS: The CVs of the S-values in the BMI-7 protocol group were significantly lower than those in the BMI-3 protocol group for the standing (28.8% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.01) and supine (24.5% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.01) positions. The ESDs of patients scanned using the BMI-7 protocol were significantly lower than those scanned using the BMI-3 protocol in the standing (1.3 vs. 1.1 mGy; p < 0.01) and supine positions (2.5 vs. 1.6 mGy; p < 0.01), although the mean BMI of the two groups were similar. CONCLUSION: We introduced the BMI-7 protocol and demonstrated its standardized image quality and reduced radiation exposure in patients undergoing DCR.