Microbial fuel cell scale-up options: Performance evaluation of membrane (c-MFC) and membrane-less (s-MFC) systems under different feeding regimes

微生物燃料电池规模化方案:不同进料方式下膜式(c-MFC)和无膜式(s-MFC)系统的性能评估

阅读:1

Abstract

In recent years, bioelectrochemical systems have advanced towards upscaling applications and tested during field trials, primarily for wastewater treatment. Amongst reported trials, two designs of urine-fed microbial fuel cells (MFCs) were tested successfully on a pilot scale as autonomous sanitation systems for decentralised area. These designs, known as ceramic MFCs ( c -MFCs) and self-stratifying MFCs ( s -MFC), have never been calibrated under similar conditions. Here, the most advanced versions of both designs were assembled and tested under similar feeding conditions. The performance and efficiency were evaluated under different hydraulic retention times (HRT), through chemical oxygen demand measures and polarisation experiments. Results show that c -MFCs displayed constant performance independently from the HRT (32.2 ± 3.9 W m(-3)) whilst displaying high energy conversion efficiency at longer HRT (NER (COD) = 2.092 ± 0.119 KWh.Kg (COD) (-1), at 24h HRT). The s -MFC showed a correlation between performance and HRT. The highest performance was reached under short HRT (69.7 ± 0.4 W m(-3) at 3h HRT), but the energy conversion efficiency was constant independently from the HRT (0.338 ± 0.029 KWh.Kg (COD) (-1)). The c -MFCs and s -MFCs similarly showed the highest volumetric efficiency under long HRT (65h) with NER (V) of 0.747 ± 0.010 KWh.m(-3) and 0.825 ± 0.086 KWh.m(-3), respectively. Overall, c -MFCs seems more appropriate for longer HRT and s -MFCs for shorter HRT.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。