Abstract
BACKGROUND: New molecular methods of detecting Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) provide the routine lab with a sensitive random access method to produce results that are available in a shorter time than traditional methods. METHODS: In this prospective study a total of 989 stool specimens were tested over a period of 16 months in parallel using two isothermal amplification assays, AmpliVue® (Quidel) and Illumigene® (Meridian) and the results compared to those from toxigenic culture. In addition all specimens were tested using a cytotoxic cell neutralisation assay (CCNA) and three different Real-time PCR targeting a C. difficile-specific 16S rDNA sequence or the toxin genes tcdA, tcdB/tcdB027 or cdtB. RESULTS: AmpliVue® was positive in 242 (24.5%) and Illumigene® in 228 (23.1%) specimens. 167 (16.9%) specimens were positive in toxigenic culture. Real-time-tcdA and -tcdB PCR was positive in 211 (21.3%) specimens, Real-time-cdtB PCR was positive in 101 (10.2%) specimens and C. difficile-PCR (16S rDNA) in 267 (27.0%) specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The respective sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value compared to toxigenic culture were 91, 89, 62 and 98% for AmpliVue® and 91, 91, 67 and 98% for Illumigene®.