Choose Your Level Wisely: Assessing Density Functionals and Dispersion Corrections for Metal Carbonyl Compounds

明智地选择你的级别:评估金属羰基化合物的密度泛函和色散校正

阅读:2

Abstract

Understanding the structure of metal-ligand complexes is essential for catalyst design, materials development, and biochemical modeling. Metal carbonyls are especially relevant due to their diverse structures and electronic features. Here, we benchmarked seventeen density functionals (B3LYP, BP86, CAM-B3LYP, M06, M06L, PBE, PBE0, r(2)SCAN, r(2)SCAN-3c, revPBE, revTPSS, RPBE, TPSS, TPSS0, TPSSh, ω B97, and ω B97X) combined with three dispersion schemes (D3zero, D3BJ, D4) and also tested calculations without dispersion correction, totaling fifty-four approaches. Their ability to reproduce geometries, structural parameters, and CO stretching frequencies was assessed for thirty-four Mn(I) and Re(I) carbonyls obtained from the CCDC. Relative electronic energies were further compared using DLPNO-CCSD(T) calculations, alongside evaluation of computational cost. Our results highlight that hybrid meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals, particularly TPSSh(D3zero) and r(2)SCAN(D3BJ, D4), offer the best balance between accuracy and efficiency, providing reliable structures, vibration properties, and energetics consistent with high-level DLPNO-CCSD(T) references.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。