Relative age selection bias does not translate into a playing-time advantage: evidence from Italian Serie A football

相对年龄选择偏差并不会转化为上场时间优势:来自意甲足球的证据

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Relative Age Effects (RAEs) represent a bias in talent identification and selection processes, favouring athletes born earlier in the selection year. This study aimed to (i) quantify the prevalence and magnitude of the RAEs in Italian elite football (Serie A), considering age categories, playing positions, and team ranking, and (ii) examine whether RAEs are associated with selection- and participation-related outcomes (i.e., match appearances, total playing time, and consistency of match participation). METHODS: Data from 789 Serie A players were analysed. RESULTS: Q1 players were overrepresented compared with Q4 players (OR=1.9 [1.5-2.6]). RAEs were more pronounced in younger players (OR=2.1 [1.4-3.2]) and more evident among goalkeepers (OR=4.4 [1.8-10.6]) followed by forwards (OR=2.0 [1.0-3.8]), midfielders (OR=1.9 [1.1-3.1]) and defenders (OR=1.6 [1.0-2.4]). Moreover, RAEs were stronger in lower-tier teams (OR=2.5 [1.4-4.5]) than in top-tier teams (OR=1.5 [0.8-2.7]). No differences were observed between quartiles in selection- and participation-related outcomes. DISCUSSION: RAEs persist in Serie A rosters but appear to operate primarily as a selection-level bias within talent development and squad selection, affecting which players reach and remain at the elite level, rather than influencing coaches' decisions regarding match participation once players are part of the professional environment.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。