Valid and Reliable Barbell Velocity Estimation Using an Inertial Measurement Unit

利用惯性测量单元进行有效可靠的杠铃速度估计

阅读:1

Abstract

The accurate assessment of the mean concentric barbell velocity (MCV) and its displacement are crucial aspects of resistance training. Therefore, the validity and reliability indicators of an easy-to-use inertial measurement unit (VmaxPro(®)) were examined. Nineteen trained males (23.1 ± 3.2 years, 1.78 ± 0.08 m, 75.8 ± 9.8 kg; Squat 1-Repetition maximum (1RM): 114.8 ± 24.5 kg) performed squats and hip thrusts (3-5 sets, 30 repetitions total, 75% 1RM) on two separate days. The MCV and displacement were simultaneously measured using VmaxPro(®) and a linear position transducer (Speed4Lift(®)). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (0.91 < ICC < 0.96) with a small systematic bias (p < 0.001; η(p)(2) < 0.50) for squats (0.01 ± 0.04 m·s(-1)) and hip thrusts (0.01 ± 0.05 m·s(-1)) and a low limit of agreement (LoA < 0.12 m·s(-1)) indicated an acceptable validity. The within- and between-day reliability of the MCV revealed good ICCs (0.55 < ICC < 0.91) and a low LoA (<0.16 m·s(-1)). Although the displacement revealed a systematic bias during squats (p < 0.001; η(p)(2) < 0.10; 3.4 ± 3.4 cm), no bias was detectable during hip thrusts (p = 0.784; η(p)(2) < 0.001; 0.3 ± 3.3 cm). The displacement showed moderate to good ICCs (0.43 to 0.95) but a high LoA (7.8 to 10.7 cm) for the validity and (within- and between-day) reliability of squats and hip thrusts. The VmaxPro(®) is considered to be a valid and reliable tool for the MCV assessment.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。