Abstract
Monovision is a common correction for presbyopia that focuses one eye at far distances and the other at near distances, resulting in an interocular difference in blur between the eyes. Because blur increases the speed of visual processing by a few milliseconds, these optical conditions can induce dramatic misperceptions of the distances and 3D directions of moving objects. To date, however, the illusion has been demonstrated in only non-presbyopic individuals. We analyze the prevalence of both the processing speed differences and the visibility of the resulting illusions in the presbyopic and general populations.17 presbyopes (54.4±5.9years) and 36 non-presbyopes (22.2±5.0years) participated. The proportions of these participant populations approximately match their proportions in the general population. Two strips of horizontally moving bars were presented on an autostereoscopic display with interocular blur and light-level differences. The task was to report which strip appeared closer in depth. Blur- and light-level differences caused illusions that are respectively known as the reverse and classic Pulfrich effects. Interocular delay and an illusion visibility index-the ratio of interocular delay and the detection threshold-were obtained from each participant for both blur and light-level differences between the eyes. Blur- and light-level differences cause highly significant changes in processing speed at the individual and group levels. (The two populations were statistically indistinguishable in their susceptibility to stimulus-induced processing speed differences.) The reverse and classic Pulfrich effects occurred in 94% and in 96%, respectively, of the general participant population. The visibility index showed that the processing speed discrepancy exceeded the detection threshold in a smaller number of participants-30% and 43%, respectively. Interocular differences in optical blur reliably cause interocular differences in processing speed across presbyopic and non-presbyopic populations, although they create visible (suprathreshold) illusions in only a subset of participants. However, this subset included individuals with processing delays that were many times larger than the detection threshold. These latter participants are likely to be afflicted by large, highly visible illusions in real-world conditions. Methods for reducing or eliminating these illusions are discussed.±.