Abstract
Hi-C and single cell Hi-C (scHi-C) data are now routinely generated for studying an array of biological questions of interest, including whole genome chromatin organization to gain a better understanding of the chromosome three-dimensional hierarchical structure: compartments, Topologically Associated Domains (TADs), and long-range interactions. Due to concerns about data quality, especially for scHi-C because of its sparsity, data quality improvement is seen as a necessary step before performing analyses to answer biological questions. As such, methods have been developed accordingly, among them is a set of methods that are "random walk"- based, including random walk with a limited number of steps (RWS) and random walk with restart (RWR). Nevertheless, there is little justification for the use of such methods, nor quantification of their performance success. Taking correct identification of TADs as the end point, in this paper, we describe the characteristics of random-walk-based approaches and carry out empirical investigation for identifying TADs before and after random walks. Due to the lack of practical guidelines for choosing tuning parameters necessary for performing random walks, it is difficult to know how many steps of random walk for RWS or how small a restart probability for RWR should one choose to achieve good performance. Even in the unrealistic scenario when one has the hindsight to use the optimal parameter values, little improvement in downstream TAD analyses by first performing random walk was observed. This conclusion was based on extensive analytical analyses, simulation study, and real data applications. Therefore, the current study provides a cautionary note to researchers who may consider using random-walk-based approaches prior to downstream analyses.