Abstract
Although free-water diffusion reconstruction for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data can be applied to both single-shell and multishell data, recent finding in synthetic data suggests that the free-water indices from single-shell acquisition should be interpreted with care, as they are heavily influenced by initialization parameters and cannot discriminate between free-water and mean diffusivity modifications. However, whether using a longer multishell acquisition protocol significantly improve reconstruction for real human MRI data is still an open question. In this study, we compare canonical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), single-shell and multishell free-water imaging (FW) indices derived from a short, clinical compatible diffusion protocol (b = 500 s/mm(2) , b = 1,000 s/mm(2) , 32 directions each) on their power to predict brain age. Age was chosen as it is well-known to be related to widespread modification of the white matter and because brain-age estimation has recently been found to be relevant to several neurodegenerative diseases. We used a previously developed and validated data-driven whole-brain machine learning pipeline to directly compare the precision of brain-age estimates in a sample of 89 healthy males between 20 and 85 years old. We found that multishell FW outperform DTI indices in estimating brain age and that multishell FW, even when using low (500 ms(2) ) b-values secondary shell, outperform single-shell FW. Single-shell FW led to lower brain-age estimation accuracy even of canonical DTI indices, suggesting that single-shell FW indices should be used with caution. For all considered reconstruction algorithms, the most discriminant indices were those measuring free diffusion of water in the white matter.