Validation of the collapsed-cone superposition for whole-body patient-specific dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radionuclide therapy

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617放射性核素治疗中全身患者个体化剂量测定的塌缩锥叠加法的验证

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-specific dosimetry in radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) offers a promising approach to optimize the balance between treatment efficacy and toxicity. The introduction of 360° CZT gamma cameras enables the development of personalized dosimetry studies using whole-body single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (SPECT/CT) data. PURPOSE: This study proposes to validate the collapsed-cone superposition (CCS) approach against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for whole-body dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with mCRPC were retrospectively included in this study. SPECT/CT images were acquired after the infusion of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. SimpleDose was used to generate dose-rate maps (mGy/h) from a single SPECT/CT scan. The dosimetry relies on the CCS approach, which adjusts dose-point kernels according to tissue densities. Organ and lesion delineation were automated using the nnU-Net V2 neural network. MC simulations were performed with GATE 10 for 10(8) events. To assess the impact of density-scaled DPK on the accuracy of the dosimetry, we implement a simplified version of CCS, denoted as CCSST , which assumes a homogeneous soft tissue medium without incorporating the patient-specific density information derived from the CT image. The comparison between CCS, CCSST and MC was conducted at the organ, lesion, and voxel levels. RESULTS: Absolute percentage errors (APE) between CCS and MC were < 5% for all organs and lesions. Compared to CCS, CCSST exhibited higher APE with respect to MC in the liver, lungs, salivary glands, and lesions, while lower errors were observed in the bone marrow, kidneys, and pancreas, with comparable performance in the spleen. Voxel-level errors were mostly < 2% for both methods CCS and CCSST . Median computation time was, respectively, 24.5 s, 46.45 s, and 6.8 h for CCS, CCSST , and MC. CONCLUSION: CCS showed high agreement with MC with greater computational efficiency, demonstrating its clinical potential for whole-body dosimetry.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。