Abstract
Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) inhibits Ca(2+)-loading during ischemia which contributes to cardioprotection by inhibiting mechanical injury due to hypercontracture and biochemical injury through mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pores during reperfusion. However, whether remote-IPC reduced Ca(2+)-loading during ischemia and its subsequent involvement in inhibiting MPT pore formation during reperfusion has not been directly shown. We have developed a cellular model of remote IPC to look at the impact of remote conditioning on Ca(2+)-regulation and MPT pore opening during simulated ischemia and reperfusion, using fluorescence microscopy. Ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated from control rat hearts, hearts preconditioned with three cycles of ischemia/reperfusion or naïve myocytes remotely conditioned with effluent collected from preconditioned hearts. Both conventional-IPC and remote-IPC reduced the loss of Ca(2+)-homeostasis and contractile function following reenergization of metabolically inhibited cells and protected myocytes against ischemia/reperfusion injury. However, only conventional-IPC reduced the Ca(2+)-loading during metabolic inhibition and this was independent of any change in sarcKATP channel activity but was associated with a reduction in Na(+)-loading, reflecting a decrease in Na/H exchanger activity. Remote-IPC delayed opening of the MPT pores in response to ROS, which was dependent on PKCε and NOS-signaling. These data show that remote-IPC inhibits MPT pore opening to a similar degree as conventional IPC, however, the contribution of MPT pore inhibition to protection against reperfusion injury is independent of Ca(2+)-loading in remote IPC. We suggest that inhibition of the MPT pore and not Ca(2+)-loading is the common link in cardioprotection between conventional and remote IPC.