Abstract
The Rotalex test, a commercial latex agglutination test for rotavirus, was compared with direct electron microscopy (EM) and the Rotazyme test I, a commercial enzyme immunoassay, for detection of rotavirus in stools of children and neonates. For initial stool specimens from 265 children (less than 3 years old) with diarrhea, the Rotalex test had a sensitivity of 81.7% and specificity of 99.5% compared with EM results. Positive and negative predictive values were 98 and 94.9%, respectively. The Rotalex test was slightly more sensitive and specific than the Rotazyme test. When daily stool specimens from patients with rotavirus gastroenteritis were examined, the sensitivity of the Rotalex test varied depending on the time of stool collection relative to the onset of symptoms. Sensitivity was 100 (20/20), 96 (23/24), and 54% (7/13) during 1 to 4, 5 to 7, and 8 to 18 days, respectively, after the onset of symptoms. The sensitivity of the Rotazyme test varied similarly with days from onset. We also examined 214 EM-negative stool specimens from asymptomatic newborns. False positivity by the Rotalex test was only 3.3% (7/214) compared with 4.2% (9/215) for the Rotazyme test. The Rotalex test was as sensitive and specific as EM for detection of rotavirus during the acute stage of illness and much faster and cheaper than EM or the Rotazyme test. The test appears to be suitable for routine use in small hospitals, emergency wards, or even the physician's office for rapid diagnosis of rotavirus gastroenteritis.