Abstract
Koala retrovirus (KoRV) is unique in that it exists as both an exogenous and actively endogenizing gamma retrovirus of koalas. While nine subtypes of KoRV have been recognized, focused study of these subtypes in koalas over time and with different health outcomes has been lacking. Therefore, in this study, three wild koala cohorts were established and monitored to examine KoRV proviral and expression data from koalas that either remained healthy over time, began healthy before developing chlamydial cystitis, or presented with chlamydial cystitis and were treated with antibiotics. Deep sequencing of the proviral KoRV envelope gene revealed KoRV-A, -B, -D, and -F to be the major subtypes in this population and allowed for subtype-specific assays to be created. Quantification of KoRV transcripts revealed that KoRV-D expression mirrored the total KoRV expression levels (106 copies/ml of plasma), with KoRV-A and KoRV-F expression being ∼10-fold less and KoRV-B expression being ∼100-fold less, when detected. Strikingly, there was significantly higher expression of KoRV-D in healthy koalas than in koalas that developed chlamydial cystitis, with healthy koalas expressing a major KoRV-D/minor KoRV-A profile, whereas koalas that developed cystitis had variable KoRV expression profiles. Total anti-KoRV IgG antibody levels were found not to correlate with the expression of total KoRV or any individual KoRV subtype. Finally, KoRV expression was consistent between systemic and mucosal body sites and during antibiotic treatment. Collectively, this gives a comprehensive picture of KoRV dynamics during several important koala health states.IMPORTANCE The long-term survival of the koala is under serious threat, with this iconic marsupial being declared "vulnerable" by the Australian Government and officially listed as a threatened species. KoRV is clearly contributing to the overall health status of koalas, and research into this virus has been lacking detailed study of the multiple subtypes at both the proviral and expressed viral levels over time. By designing new subtype-specific assays and following well-defined koala cohorts over time, this study has generated a new more complete picture of KoRV and its relationship to koala health outcomes in the wild. Only by building a comprehensive picture of KoRV during both koala health and disease can we bring meaningful koala health interventions into better focus.