Abstract
Tremor, defined as an "involuntary, rhythmic, oscillatory movement of a body part", is a key feature of many neurological conditions including Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. Clinical assessment continues to be performed by visual observation with quantification on clinical scales. Methodologies for objectively quantifying tremor are promising but remain non-standardized across centers. Our center performs full-body behavioral testing with 3D motion capture for clinical and research purposes in patients with Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and other conditions. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of several candidate processing pipelines to identify the presence or absence of tremor in kinematic data from patients with confirmed movement disorders and compare them to expert ratings from movement disorders specialists. We curated a database of 2272 separate kinematic data recordings from our center, each of which was contemporaneously annotated as tremor present or absent by a movement physician. We compared the ability of six separate processing pipelines to recreate clinician ratings based on F1 score, in addition to accuracy, precision, and recall. The performance across algorithms was generally comparable. The average F1 score was 0.84±0.02 (mean ± SD; range 0.81-0.87). The second highest performing algorithm (cross-validated F1=0.87) was a hybrid that used engineered features adapted from an algorithm in longstanding clinical use with a modern Support Vector Machine classifier. Taken together, our results suggest the potential to update legacy clinical decision support systems to incorporate modern machine learning classifiers to create better-performing tools.