Abstract
Aim was to compare image-guided navigation with a robot-assisted solution for performing MISS regarding precision, required time and subjective aspects. 90 pedicles were instrumented on two torsos, half with navigation, half robot-assisted. Precision analysis between both solutions didn't show a significant difference. Time measurement showed a significantly longer duration per wire for the robot-arm on the first torso and a not significant longer duration on the second torso, where a significant reduction in the mean duration was shown. There was no significant difference in the subjective impressions comparing navigation and robot except the possibility to change the procedure. Precision of both methods is suitable for clinical use. A time advantage using the robot-arm couldn't be demonstrated in the present study. A significant learning curve was shown, so a reduction in the longer duration on the robot can be expected. Further studies in clinical use are necessary.