Comparison of dry and wet electroencephalography for the assessment of cognitive evoked potentials and sensor-level connectivity

比较干式和湿式脑电图在评估认知诱发电位和感觉层连接性方面的差异

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multipin dry electrodes (dry EEG) provide faster and more convenient application than wet EEG, enabling extensive data collection. This study aims to compare task-related time-frequency representations and resting-state connectivity between wet and dry EEG methods to establish a foundation for using dry EEG in investigations of brain activity in neuropsychiatric disorders. METHODS: In this counterbalanced cross-over study, we acquired wet and dry EEG in 33 healthy participants [n = 22 females, mean age (SD) = 24.3 (± 3.4) years] during resting-state and an auditory oddball paradigm. We computed mismatch negativity (MMN), theta power in task EEG, and connectivity measures from resting-state EEG using phase lag index (PLI) and minimum spanning tree (MST). Agreement between wet and dry EEG was assessed using Bland-Altman bias. RESULTS: MMN was detectable with both systems in time and frequency domains, but dry EEG underestimated MMN mean amplitude, peak latency, and theta power compared to wet EEG. Resting-state connectivity was reliably estimated with dry EEG using MST diameter in all except the very low frequencies (0.5-4 Hz). PLI showed larger differences between wet and dry EEG in all frequencies except theta. CONCLUSION: Dry EEG reliably detected MMN and resting-state connectivity despite a lower signal-to-noise ratio. This study provides the methodological basis for using dry EEG in studies investigating the neural processes underlying psychiatric and neurological conditions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。