Impact of needle-point bipolar ionization system in the reduction of bioaerosols in collective transport

针尖双极电离系统对集体输送中生物气溶胶减少的影响

阅读:8
作者:Marta Baselga, Juan J Alba, Alberto J Schuhmacher

Abstract

Abstract in English, Spanish Unlabelled Image The transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 is higher in collective transport than in other public environments. Transport companies require preventive strategies to mitigate airborne risk of contagion which not imply responsible use at the individual level. Air purification systems, such as UV-C or needle-tip bipolar ionization, are attractive alternatives. However, only a few studies addressing the validation of this technology against bioaerosols in actual operation conditions have been published so far. In this work, the efficiency of a bipolar ionization unit in the Zaragoza Tram has been evaluated. Against environmental bioaerosols, ionization (~25.7 · 109 ions/m3, on average) reduced the concentration of colony-forming units (CFU) by ~46 % and ~69 % after 30 and 90 min. No clear benefits were obtained against microorganisms on inner tram surfaces (seats, grab bars, walls, and windows). ‘Pre-pandemic’ filtration equipment located in the HVAC based on a Coarse 45 %-type filter removed ~73 and ~ 92 % of aerial CFU by itself after 30 and 90 min. Microscopic visualization of the CFUs revealed that they were mostly >1 μm, much larger than the SARS-CoV-2 virion (~100 nm) and SARS-CoV-2-loaded bioaerosols (from 0.25 μm). Then, we studied the filter behavior under normalized laboratory methods. The filters efficiency against submicron particles was limited (between 5 and 12 % against 0.1 to 0.3 μm NaCl particles). Another ionization strategy was to generate aerosol agglomerates to enhance filtration performance, but the combined action of ionization and filtration did not improve substantially. The effect of these technologies was also characterized using the clean air delivery rate (CADR). Relative to untreated air (CADR = 0.299 m3/min), ionization and filtration reduce ambient CFUs (CADR = 5.153 and 9.261 m3/min, respectively; and CADR = 13.208 m3/min, combined) which implies that it has a substantial impact on indoor bioaerosols.

特别声明

1、本文转载旨在传播信息,不代表本网站观点,亦不对其内容的真实性承担责任。

2、其他媒体、网站或个人若从本网站转载使用,必须保留本网站注明的“来源”,并自行承担包括版权在内的相关法律责任。

3、如作者不希望本文被转载,或需洽谈转载稿费等事宜,请及时与本网站联系。

4、此外,如需投稿,也可通过邮箱info@biocloudy.com与我们取得联系。