Abstract
Long-term processes, manifesting themselves in slow geometrical alterations and changes in internal forces, have been known and observed to take place mainly in large bridges made of prestressed concrete, but they also occur, albeit to a smaller degree, in steel bridges. Two sets of data, coming from, respectively, multi-year geodetic surveys and the structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge (forces in its stays), were compared. Using the collocation method, displacements consistent with the results of the geodetic measurements were input into a numerical model of the bridge. Then, changes in the forces in the stays, which should accompany the displacements, were computed. The computed changes were compared with the actual changes in the mean force values in the stays of the bridge recorded over an eight-year period of its structural health monitoring. The two sets of data were found to be not in satisfactory good agreement. The main factors making it difficult to reach full agreement were the very small relative values of the observed geometrical alterations (the deformation, i.e., the increase in deflection, of the 375 m long span amounting merely 10-15 mm after eight years of periodic measurement) and the very small changes (amounting to about 0.5% for 8 years of monitoring) in the mean forces in the stays, as well as the possible mistakes in the survey. Despite these difficulties, the employed collocation method proved to be effective. It was also found that the long-term geometrical alterations and the changes in the forces in the stays do not adversely affect the safety of the bridge and its use.