Sealing Ability Comparison of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin-An In Vitro Stereomicroscopic Study

三种不同根管充填系统对牙根内牙本质封闭能力的比较-体外立体显微镜研究

阅读:20
作者:Mohammed Khwaja Moinuddin, Nimeshika Ramachandruni, Ayesha Tehreem, Swetha Kasam, Sakthivel Anbalagan, N Anupama

Background

Different obturation techniques are being used to improve canal sealing, thereby minimizing marginal leakage. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the marginal leakage of three different obturating materials and techniques using stereomicroscope. Materials and

Conclusion

None of the tested filling materials provided a gap-free or void-free root canal filling; however, thermoplasticized gutta-percha is used with AH Plus sealer exhibited less voids and gaps when compared to other tested materials.

Methods

Thirty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and were divided into three groups of 10 each for which the biomechanical preparation was done. The teeth were divided into three experimental groups according to the obturation material and technique used, Group I: gutta-percha with AH Plus root canal sealer (lateral condensation): Group II: thermoplasticized gutta-percha technique-non-carrier-based (calamus) with AH Plus sealer (backfill): Group III: C point (self-sealing root canal obturating system) with bioceramic sealer (single cone). Each specimen was subjected for testing apical sealing ability. The values of microleakage associated with different root canal sealers were evaluated using a stereomicroscope.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of apical dye penetration/leakage among all the three groups (P = 0.091), whereas Group I showed a higher degree of apical leakage than the other techniques tested.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。