Background
In recent years, several high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) tests have been developed. The assay capabilities need to be systematically reviewed. Here, we compared the clinical sample performance of three novel HR-HPV assays (Liferiver, Yaneng, and Darui) based on different platforms with the widely adopted cobas4800 test.
Conclusions
The three novel HR-HPV assays displayed good agreement with the cobas4800 test. The analytical performance of all four fulfilled the requirements of sensitivity and specificity for HR-HPV detection.
Methods
A total of 346 cervical swabs from women who were screened for cervical cancer were analyzed for the presence of 14 HR-HPV genotypes. The distinction between the four assays was investigated by the genotyping and direct sequencing.
Results
The positive rates of the four assays ranged from 61.56% to 64.16%. The overall concordance was 88.15%. The Yaneng assays displayed the best sensitivity (100%) and specificity (98.43%). The sensitivity (98.17%) and specificity (98.43%) of the Darui assay were superior to those of the cobas4800 test (97.72% and 93.70%, respectively). The Liferiver assay displayed comparable sensitivity with the cobas4800 test (95.89% and 97.72%, respectively). The specificity of the cobas4800 was lower than that of the Liferiver assay (93.70% vs. 97.64%). Conclusions: The three novel HR-HPV assays displayed good agreement with the cobas4800 test. The analytical performance of all four fulfilled the requirements of sensitivity and specificity for HR-HPV detection.